Orders, Decorations, Medals and Militaria

Lieutenant-Colonel Edward Boyd, 29th Foot, late Royal Staff Corps, who was wounded at Badajoz and again at Toulouse, and afterwards became Surveyor General of Van Diemen’s Land before rejoining the British Army

Military General Service 1793-1814, 4 clasps, Badajoz, Nivelle, Nive, Toulouse (E. P. Boyd, Ensn. Royal Staff Corps) naming of ‘Ensn.’ and ‘Staff’ retouched with old restoration of once severe edge bruises at these points, otherwise very fine £1800-2200

This lot was sold as part of a special collection, A Collection of Napoleonic War Medals.

View
Collection

Provenance: Not previously recorded.

Edward Boyd was born in about 1794 and was appointed an Ensign in the Royal Staff Corps on 20 October 1811. He was promoted
Lieutenant on 1 July 1812 and ‘was employed in the Peninsula from March 1812 to the end of that war, in 1814, and was present at the storming of Badajoz (wounded), battles of the Nivelle, Nive, Tarbes, and Toulouse (wounded).’ (Hart’s Army List refers).

The following extract which covers his later career is taken from the Australian Dictionary of Biography:

‘Edward Boyd (1794?-1871), surveyor general, was born in England, and educated at the Royal Military College, Sandhurst. He became an ensign in July 1811, and a lieutenant in the Royal Staff Corps a year later. He saw active service in southern France and in the Peninsula, where he distinguished himself in laying down a bridge of boats across the Adour before receiving severe wounds. After the war he acted as aide-de-camp and private secretary to Major-General Smyth, lieutenant-governor of New Brunswick in 1817-23, and was also engaged on public works. In 1826 he received the rank of captain and the duties of paymaster, retiring on half-pay in July 1829 when appointed deputy surveyor general in Van Diemen's Land at a salary of £350.

He arrived in Hobart Town in the Lady Harewood in July with his wife Jane, and a servant, who was to superintend the office in Hobart. In 1833, after much protest, Boyd was sent to open a branch of the department in Launceston. Disputes arose with the surveyor-general, whom he unjustly accused of failing in duty by himself staying in Hobart and sending Boyd to Launceston. His usefulness there was also limited by delay in the sending of essential maps from Hobart. Ill health, lingering from a paralysis suffered in Canada, prevented him from carrying out the survey of the town of Launceston, so disappointing the lieutenant-governor's hopes. Boyd's resentment at transfer back to Hobart, because his Launceston services were deemed a failure, capped his record of complaints. Nevertheless, as the senior administrative officer in the department, he became surveyor-general in January 1839, after the death of George Frankland, but the appointment was not to be confirmed until Lieutenant-Governor Sir John Franklin had been assured that ill health would not limit Boyd's efficiency in the office. Six months later abusive complaints of Boyd's unanswered correspondence and his indecision on the accuracy of surveys were embarrassing the government. By June 1840 it was obvious to Franklin that, although Boyd's health had improved, his energy and memory were affected, and he appealed to the Colonial Office for a surveyor-general from England. At this time Boyd was also criticised for careless administration of the system of contract surveying. His explanation evidenced his integrity and goodwill, but failed to exonerate him from charges of negligence. In November 1840 the Executive Council advised Franklin to appoint a successor at once and remove Boyd to his former position as deputy, on grounds of ill health. Boyd took the cue; he applied at once for leave, was awarded half-pay at deputy's rates, and prepared to embark in the Emu. At this point a further complaint was referred to the Executive Council: he appeared guilty of putting up for sale land previously promised to settlers. When Boyd refused to answer summary demands for immediate explanation, his half-pay was cancelled. On arrival in England in April 1841 he presented his case to the Colonial Office, but, as his army half-pay was jeopardised by the delay in receiving information from the colony, he resigned and rejoined the army. In November 1841 he was promoted major in the 29th Regiment, and later saw service at Ghazipur, India. In 1854 he received the rank of lieutenant-colonel, having retired on captain's half-pay in 1850. He died in London on 2 November 1871, aged 77.’